The office of Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy spent thousands of dollars on an advertising campaign last year that urged Alaskans to sign petitions for a larger Permanent Fund dividend, to cap state spending and repeal criminal justice reform, but those petitions never existed, an ethics investigator has concluded.
Instead, the ad campaign was used to collect Alaskans' names and contact information for the governor’s office, wrote attorney John Tiemessen.
One ad said, “Lawmakers are once again trying to take your PFD. Sign Governor Dunleavy’s petition to support a full PFD.”
At the time, legislators were debating the size of the 2019 Permanent Fund dividend. Dunleavy had proposed a dividend of about $4,000; legislators set it at $1,606.
“On initial review, these ads appear to communicate the governor’s policy and allow individuals an opportunity to petition their government and offer their own opinions,” Tiemessen wrote. “However, the governor’s attorney’s correspondence with independent counsel indicates that these ‘petitions’ were only used to gather constituent information and were not used to directly petition the Legislature or to advocate for the subject policies in any manner.”
“It’s entirely possible that if the petitions had existed that would have been problematic,” he said by phone.
In that hypothetical case, the administration could have been using state money for “partisan political purposes,” something forbidden by law. As long as the state was only collecting personal information — and not sharing that information with anyone — those ads were legal, he concluded.
The governor’s office referred questions about the ads to Dunleavy attorney Brewster Jamieson, who said that all petitioners collect information.
“I don’t see how anyone is harmed or fooled or aggrieved by that process,” he said.
Jamieson said Alaskans were petitioning the governor, not lawmakers, and that each Facebook click was delivered to the administration.
“It’s submitted directly to the governor’s office,” he said.
Even though the governor’s office never presented the names of supporters to lawmakers in a traditional written petition, Jamieson speculated that the governor’s office could have cited the number of supporters when talking to individual legislators.
The petition-related ads weren’t illegal, but other ads did violate state law, Tiemessen concluded. Dunleavy agreed earlier this month to pay $2,800 to settle the ethics complaint that spawned Tiemessen’s investigation.
In addition to the Facebook ads soliciting petition signatures, the governor’s office commissioned online and mailed ads instructing voters to thank lawmakers who supported his position on state spending.
Rep. Josh Revak, R-Anchorage, and Rep. Sara Rasmussen, R-Anchorage, were among the beneficiaries of those ads, and Tiemessen concluded that because they had already signed letters of intent for the 2020 election, the ads at least partially had a partisan political purpose and violated state law. (Until the publication of Tiemessen’s report, the two lawmakers had been identified as Revak and Sen. Mia Costello, R-Anchorage.)
The governor and his attorney dispute Tiemessen’s conclusions, saying that the governor was unaware of the ads and therefore should not be liable.
“The notion that a governor would be unaware of that is preposterous,” he said.
"used" - Google News
September 24, 2020 at 08:49PM
https://ift.tt/3i13pL4
Report: Governor's advertising campaign was used to collect Alaskans' info - Anchorage Daily News
"used" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2ypoNIZ
https://ift.tt/3aVpWFD
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Report: Governor's advertising campaign was used to collect Alaskans' info - Anchorage Daily News"
Post a Comment